Scientific Paper: Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings Collapse - Steven Jones
by Dr. Steven E. Jones, physics professor at BYU
published: October 8, 2006
Dr. Steven Jones provides overwhelming, irrefutable, concrete, and thorough scientific evidence that the World Trade Center could not have collapsed due to any biproduct of the planes colliding with them [diversion] as we have been led to believe; but in fact the manner in which they collapsed and the massive energy required to bring about that result, could only be attributed to two possible energy sources currently known to science, either an atomic weapon or thermite, both substances (as well as weeks of access to the Twin Towers to plant them) only available to the government.
Indeed in his rigorous thoroughness Dr. Jones went to great lengths to obtain samples of steel debris (from pieces used for monuments to 911, since the government conveniently disposed of the vast majority of it, thus illegally tampering with evidence in a scene of a major crime) and detected significant traces of thermite. It was a controlled demolition!
This alone rules out the so-called Middle Eastern terrorists and renders them mere patsies, but Dr. Jones documents several other separate scientific tests done based on the laws of physics that all support the same devastating conclusion, it was a controlled demolition and thus an inside job. At several points Dr. Jones even uses the government supplied data to show the government version of events is simply impossible.
Needless to say, this is quite shocking to most of us who saw 911 on television as it was unfolding and believed the initial explanations, and is not what we wanted to hear. But the facts and evidence powerfully speak for themselves and in the end are undeniable, and we owe it to our children to become well-informed and begin to deal with this.
The next natural question that arises is "why?," but that is for another day and time, here it is enough to digest and establish the "what?" and Dr. Jones clearly helps us do that well.
Dr. Jones is therefore a hero for investigating and resolving one aspect of the biggest issue of our time and having the courage to publish his findings when it would have been far easier to remain a successful anonymous university professor. But as is common with all truth tellers (of important truths) this man of integrity (and there are many videos of him in the internet) has taken a lot of unfair abuse from deeply entrenched treasonous interests that apparently are behind and have profited from 911.
Even without Dr. Jones' paper, the dirty little secret of 911 was and is spreading quickly anyway, but this paper gives it more credibility and legitimacy, which it will need to fend off unfair criticisms and attacks, since it is based on the truth. It may also help create a better informed citizenry who will collectively be greatly outraged and we hope will sooner bring all the guilty criminals to swift and certain justice.
Please read and share Dr. Jones' historic paper (kindly reach at least a 1:1 share ratio!)
Physics professor Steven Jones enumerates thirteen reasons to challenge government reports and investigate the controlled-demolition hypothesis:
1. Molten Metal: Flowing and in Pools
2. Observed Temperatures around 1000ºC and Sulfidation in WTC 7 Steel
3. Near-Symmetrical Collapse of WTC 7
4. No Previous Skyscraper Collapse Due to Fires
5. Squib-timing during the Collapse of WTC 7
6. Early Drop of North Tower Antenna
7. Eyewitness Accounts of Flashes and Loud Explosions
8. Ejection of Steel Beams and Debris – plumes from the Towers
9. Rapid Collapses and Conservation of Momentum and Energy
10. Controlled Demolition "Implosions" Require Skill
11. Steel Column Temperatures of 800ºC Needed: A Problem in the Argument of Bazant and Zhou
12. Problems in the NIST Report: Inadequate Steel Temperatures and Tweaked Models
13. NIST's Failure to Show Visualizations